public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/53440] New: [arm] generic thunk code fails for method which uses '...'
@ 2012-05-21 18:04 rmansfield at qnx dot com
2012-05-21 18:14 ` [Bug target/53440] " rmansfield at qnx dot com
` (5 more replies)
0 siblings, 6 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: rmansfield at qnx dot com @ 2012-05-21 18:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53440
Bug #: 53440
Summary: [arm] generic thunk code fails for method which uses
'...'
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: rmansfield@qnx.com
This is a target bug but it's related to bug 7618 (which was mips specific).
I'm opening a new PR for arm-gnueabi as it is a primary target
$ ./xgcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=./xgcc
Target: arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi
Configured with: ../configure --target=arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi
--prefix=/home/ryan/x-tools/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi
--with-sysroot=/home/ryan/x-tools/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi//sys-root
--disable-multilib
--with-local-prefix=/home/ryan/x-tools/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi/sys-root
--disable-nls --enable-threads=posix --enable-symvers=gnu --enable-c99
--enable-long-long --enable-target-optspace
target_alias=arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi --enable-languages=c++ --disable-shared
--disable-libmudflap --disable-libssp --enable-checking
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.8.0 20120521 (experimental) [trunk revision 187727] (GCC)
$ ./xgcc -B. ~/t.cc
/home/ryan/t.cc:18:1: error: generic thunk code fails for method 'virtual void
Test::Log(const char*, ...)' which uses '...'
}};
^
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug target/53440] [arm] generic thunk code fails for method which uses '...' 2012-05-21 18:04 [Bug target/53440] New: [arm] generic thunk code fails for method which uses '...' rmansfield at qnx dot com @ 2012-05-21 18:14 ` rmansfield at qnx dot com 2012-05-21 20:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ` (4 subsequent siblings) 5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: rmansfield at qnx dot com @ 2012-05-21 18:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53440 --- Comment #1 from Ryan Mansfield <rmansfield at qnx dot com> 2012-05-21 18:04:03 UTC --- Created attachment 27463 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27463 test case ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/53440] [arm] generic thunk code fails for method which uses '...' 2012-05-21 18:04 [Bug target/53440] New: [arm] generic thunk code fails for method which uses '...' rmansfield at qnx dot com 2012-05-21 18:14 ` [Bug target/53440] " rmansfield at qnx dot com @ 2012-05-21 20:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-22 12:30 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu.org ` (3 subsequent siblings) 5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-05-21 20:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53440 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-05-21 18:55:04 UTC --- Someone needs to implement the thunk functionality for arm. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/53440] [arm] generic thunk code fails for method which uses '...' 2012-05-21 18:04 [Bug target/53440] New: [arm] generic thunk code fails for method which uses '...' rmansfield at qnx dot com 2012-05-21 18:14 ` [Bug target/53440] " rmansfield at qnx dot com 2012-05-21 20:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-05-22 12:30 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-22 16:40 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org ` (2 subsequent siblings) 5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: ramana at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-05-22 12:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53440 Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed| |2012-05-22 CC| |ramana at gcc dot gnu.org Ever Confirmed|0 |1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/53440] [arm] generic thunk code fails for method which uses '...' 2012-05-21 18:04 [Bug target/53440] New: [arm] generic thunk code fails for method which uses '...' rmansfield at qnx dot com ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2012-05-22 12:30 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-05-22 16:40 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-23 1:27 ` rmansfield at qnx dot com 2015-10-20 11:20 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-05-22 16:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53440 --- Comment #3 from Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-05-22 16:36:56 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Someone needs to implement the thunk functionality for arm. The ARM port does have MI thunk support. The question is "why isn't it being used"? R. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/53440] [arm] generic thunk code fails for method which uses '...' 2012-05-21 18:04 [Bug target/53440] New: [arm] generic thunk code fails for method which uses '...' rmansfield at qnx dot com ` (3 preceding siblings ...) 2012-05-22 16:40 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-05-23 1:27 ` rmansfield at qnx dot com 2015-10-20 11:20 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: rmansfield at qnx dot com @ 2012-05-23 1:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53440 --- Comment #4 from Ryan Mansfield <rmansfield at qnx dot com> 2012-05-23 00:12:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > Someone needs to implement the thunk functionality for arm. > > The ARM port does have MI thunk support. The question is "why isn't it being > used"? I may be answering the question too directly but it's using the default_can_output_mi_thunk_no_vcall and vcall_offset is non-zero. The ARM MI thunk code doesn't do any vcall offset adjustment. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/53440] [arm] generic thunk code fails for method which uses '...' 2012-05-21 18:04 [Bug target/53440] New: [arm] generic thunk code fails for method which uses '...' rmansfield at qnx dot com ` (4 preceding siblings ...) 2012-05-23 1:27 ` rmansfield at qnx dot com @ 2015-10-20 11:20 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: ramana at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-10-20 11:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53440 Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 from Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana at gcc dot gnu.org> --- *** Bug 66755 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-10-20 11:20 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2012-05-21 18:04 [Bug target/53440] New: [arm] generic thunk code fails for method which uses '...' rmansfield at qnx dot com 2012-05-21 18:14 ` [Bug target/53440] " rmansfield at qnx dot com 2012-05-21 20:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-22 12:30 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-22 16:40 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-23 1:27 ` rmansfield at qnx dot com 2015-10-20 11:20 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).