* [Bug libstdc++/53457] Accommodate non-compliant ioctl() on VxWorks
2012-05-22 20:32 [Bug libstdc++/53457] New: Accommodate non-compliant ioctl() on VxWorks rbmj at verizon dot net
@ 2012-05-22 20:46 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2012-05-22 21:57 ` rbmj at verizon dot net
` (10 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com @ 2012-05-22 20:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53457
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC|rbmj at verizon dot net |
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2012-05-22 20:31:22 UTC ---
I'm not an expert in this area, but isn't this something fixincludes could
handle?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/53457] Accommodate non-compliant ioctl() on VxWorks
2012-05-22 20:32 [Bug libstdc++/53457] New: Accommodate non-compliant ioctl() on VxWorks rbmj at verizon dot net
2012-05-22 20:46 ` [Bug libstdc++/53457] " paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2012-05-22 21:57 ` rbmj at verizon dot net
2012-05-23 13:48 ` rbmj at verizon dot net
` (9 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: rbmj at verizon dot net @ 2012-05-22 21:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53457
rbmj at verizon dot net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rbmj at verizon dot net
--- Comment #2 from rbmj at verizon dot net 2012-05-22 20:45:59 UTC ---
I'm not a fi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/53457] Accommodate non-compliant ioctl() on VxWorks
2012-05-22 20:32 [Bug libstdc++/53457] New: Accommodate non-compliant ioctl() on VxWorks rbmj at verizon dot net
2012-05-22 20:46 ` [Bug libstdc++/53457] " paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2012-05-22 21:57 ` rbmj at verizon dot net
@ 2012-05-23 13:48 ` rbmj at verizon dot net
2012-05-23 14:19 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
` (8 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: rbmj at verizon dot net @ 2012-05-23 13:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53457
--- Comment #3 from rbmj at verizon dot net 2012-05-23 13:13:16 UTC ---
I don't know much about fixincludes, but it *seems* to me like it could be done
with fixincludes. I don't know how to get fixincludes to do that, though.
Also, sorry for the cut-off comment earlier.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/53457] Accommodate non-compliant ioctl() on VxWorks
2012-05-22 20:32 [Bug libstdc++/53457] New: Accommodate non-compliant ioctl() on VxWorks rbmj at verizon dot net
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2012-05-23 13:48 ` rbmj at verizon dot net
@ 2012-05-23 14:19 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2012-05-24 21:06 ` rbmj at verizon dot net
` (7 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com @ 2012-05-23 14:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53457
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2012-05-23 13:47:49 UTC ---
Then, please investigate that possibility, maybe ask for help on the mailing
list too, in principle I consider it a better solution.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/53457] Accommodate non-compliant ioctl() on VxWorks
2012-05-22 20:32 [Bug libstdc++/53457] New: Accommodate non-compliant ioctl() on VxWorks rbmj at verizon dot net
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2012-05-23 14:19 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2012-05-24 21:06 ` rbmj at verizon dot net
2012-05-24 22:19 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
` (6 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: rbmj at verizon dot net @ 2012-05-24 21:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53457
--- Comment #5 from rbmj at verizon dot net 2012-05-24 20:39:20 UTC ---
Would something like the following fixincludes hacks work?
/*
* Wrap VxWorks ioctl to keep everything pretty
*/
fix = {
hackname = vxworks_ioctl_macro;
files = ioLib.h;
test = " -r vxWorks.h ";
c_fix = format;
c_fix_arg = "%0\n"
"#define ioctl(fd, func, arg) ((ioctl)((fd), (func), ((int)(arg))))\n";
c_fix_arg = "extern[\t ]+int[\t ]+ioctl[\t ]*\([\t ,[:alnum:]]\);";
test_text = "`touch vxWorks.h`"
"extern int ioctl ( int asdf1234, int jkl, int qwerty ) ;";
};
/*
* This hack makes makes unistd.h more POSIX-compliant on VxWorks
*/
fix = {
hackname = vxworks_unistd;
files = unistd.h;
test = " -r vxWorks.h ";
select = "#[\t ]*include[\t ]+<vxWorks.h>";
c_fix = format;
c_fix_arg = "%0\n#include <ioLib.h>\n"
"#ifndef STDIN_FILENO\n"
"#define STDIN_FILENO 0\n"
"#endif\n"
"#ifndef STDOUT_FILENO\n"
"#define STDOUT_FILENO 1\n"
"#endif\n"
"#ifndef STDERR_FILENO\n"
"#define STDERR_FILENO 2\n"
"#endif\n";
test_text = "`touch vxWorks.h`"
"#include <vxWorks.h>\n";
};
For some reason fixincludes doesn't seem to be doing *anything* when I build
though - I'm confused as to how I run it. Though looking at fixincludes/README
and the make check tests, everything *looks* correct.
I'm not sure why fixincludes doesn't appear to be applying any fixes. I can't
find any headers in GCC's build tree that it's applying to, and it's not
applying them to the system headers either.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/53457] Accommodate non-compliant ioctl() on VxWorks
2012-05-22 20:32 [Bug libstdc++/53457] New: Accommodate non-compliant ioctl() on VxWorks rbmj at verizon dot net
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2012-05-24 21:06 ` rbmj at verizon dot net
@ 2012-05-24 22:19 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2012-06-25 18:23 ` rbmj at verizon dot net
` (5 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com @ 2012-05-24 22:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53457
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2012-05-24 22:17:15 UTC ---
I think you should post your ongoing work on the mailing lists (gcc-patches and
CC libstdc++)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/53457] Accommodate non-compliant ioctl() on VxWorks
2012-05-22 20:32 [Bug libstdc++/53457] New: Accommodate non-compliant ioctl() on VxWorks rbmj at verizon dot net
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2012-05-24 22:19 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2012-06-25 18:23 ` rbmj at verizon dot net
2012-10-01 23:43 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
` (4 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: rbmj at verizon dot net @ 2012-06-25 18:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53457
--- Comment #7 from rbmj at verizon dot net 2012-06-25 18:23:02 UTC ---
Fixed with this (approved, but not committed) patch series:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-06/msg00382.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/53457] Accommodate non-compliant ioctl() on VxWorks
2012-05-22 20:32 [Bug libstdc++/53457] New: Accommodate non-compliant ioctl() on VxWorks rbmj at verizon dot net
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2012-06-25 18:23 ` rbmj at verizon dot net
@ 2012-10-01 23:43 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2012-10-02 1:08 ` rbmj at verizon dot net
` (3 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com @ 2012-10-01 23:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53457
--- Comment #8 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2012-10-01 23:43:25 UTC ---
Can we close this now? I think we figured out that wasn't a C++ library-proper
issue, instead a fixincludes issue, but I don't understand whether the patches
are actually in and we can close this?!?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/53457] Accommodate non-compliant ioctl() on VxWorks
2012-05-22 20:32 [Bug libstdc++/53457] New: Accommodate non-compliant ioctl() on VxWorks rbmj at verizon dot net
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2012-10-01 23:43 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2012-10-02 1:08 ` rbmj at verizon dot net
2012-10-02 9:56 ` [Bug target/53457] " paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: rbmj at verizon dot net @ 2012-10-02 1:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53457
--- Comment #9 from rbmj at verizon dot net 2012-10-02 01:08:00 UTC ---
Paolo:
This was wrapped up with several other fixincludes patches with regards to
vxWorks, and Bruce Korb has approved the set and has agreed to commit.
However, he's currently busy and unable to commit until "the end of October".
Ref: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-09/msg01619.html
Robert Mason
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/53457] Accommodate non-compliant ioctl() on VxWorks
2012-05-22 20:32 [Bug libstdc++/53457] New: Accommodate non-compliant ioctl() on VxWorks rbmj at verizon dot net
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2012-10-02 1:08 ` rbmj at verizon dot net
@ 2012-10-02 9:56 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2012-10-02 18:22 ` rbmj at verizon dot net
2012-10-30 2:02 ` rbmj at verizon dot net
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com @ 2012-10-02 9:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53457
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2012-10-02
Component|libstdc++ |target
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #10 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2012-10-02 09:56:34 UTC ---
Ah I see. The problem is that he wants to do the work in a special way,
otherwise if we had an unified patch ready to go in as-is I could do the work,
of course. Please let me know if I can help (maybe Bruce Korb can do the
preparatory work even if he cannot commit?!?). Anyway, this is now "target".
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/53457] Accommodate non-compliant ioctl() on VxWorks
2012-05-22 20:32 [Bug libstdc++/53457] New: Accommodate non-compliant ioctl() on VxWorks rbmj at verizon dot net
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2012-10-02 9:56 ` [Bug target/53457] " paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2012-10-02 18:22 ` rbmj at verizon dot net
2012-10-30 2:02 ` rbmj at verizon dot net
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: rbmj at verizon dot net @ 2012-10-02 18:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53457
--- Comment #11 from rbmj at verizon dot net 2012-10-02 18:21:50 UTC ---
I've tried to split it up as I think Bruce wanted; if you check the thread,
those patches should all be ready.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/53457] Accommodate non-compliant ioctl() on VxWorks
2012-05-22 20:32 [Bug libstdc++/53457] New: Accommodate non-compliant ioctl() on VxWorks rbmj at verizon dot net
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2012-10-02 18:22 ` rbmj at verizon dot net
@ 2012-10-30 2:02 ` rbmj at verizon dot net
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: rbmj at verizon dot net @ 2012-10-30 2:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53457
rbmj at verizon dot net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #12 from rbmj at verizon dot net 2012-10-30 02:01:45 UTC ---
Fixed in 192952!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread