From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20633 invoked by alias); 25 May 2012 08:53:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 20619 invoked by uid 22791); 25 May 2012 08:53:50 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 May 2012 08:53:36 +0000 From: "kretz at kde dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/53473] [C++11] static constexpr noexcept cannot be specialized Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 09:07:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: kretz at kde dot org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-05/txt/msg02456.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53473 --- Comment #2 from Matthias Kretz 2012-05-25 08:53:36 UTC --- Does the standard allow exceptions in constexpr? A throw is not exactly a return statement, but according to the rule "constexpr function shall satisfy [...] exactly one return statement" I'd expect a constexpr function can never throw anyway. Thus the noexcept itself seems to make no sense in the first place.