From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8049 invoked by alias); 25 May 2012 16:22:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 8032 invoked by uid 22791); 25 May 2012 16:21:59 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 May 2012 16:21:46 +0000 From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug other/53489] suggest a feature for gcc. Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 17:14:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: other X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status Last reconfirmed Ever Confirmed Severity Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-05/txt/msg02494.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53489 Jonathan Wakely changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed| |2012-05-25 Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Severity|normal |enhancement --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-05-25 16:21:45 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) > It will be nice if it can add in a website like in sourceforge or google code, > they have a nice table for bugs and features. GCC already has a website and a bug database (you used it to submit this request!) What do you mean? > > I see GCC is support a Java language and it combine with GCJ > http://gcc.gnu.org/java/ > > why not to do the same with C#? What do you mean by "the same"? If the mono team wanted to contribute their compiler to GCC they would do. You'll need to be clearer what you are suggesting, as noone is going to work on a vague suggestion that they can't understand. If you can't even be bothered to escribe your idea properly why should anyone be bothered to work on it?