From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1026 invoked by alias); 28 May 2012 16:11:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 1014 invoked by uid 22791); 28 May 2012 16:11:46 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 May 2012 16:11:32 +0000 From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/53494] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE with invalid initializer list Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 16:17:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: error-recovery, ice-on-invalid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-05/txt/msg02656.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53494 --- Comment #8 from Paolo Carlini 2012-05-28 16:11:29 UTC --- "correctly rejects it" in general means "per the ISO C++ Standard, which we are implementing, the testcase is invalid with diagnostics required, thus the compiler is right in rejecting it", thus it doesn't have anything to do with providing a better, more informative, error message. Just to clarify. And indeed, I think Jon's analysis is correct. Maybe Daniel has something to add.