From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7008 invoked by alias); 28 Jun 2012 09:53:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 6999 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Jun 2012 09:53:05 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 09:52:44 +0000 From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug preprocessor/53525] Performance regression due to enabling track-macro-expansion Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 09:53:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: preprocessor X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-06/txt/msg01859.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53525 --- Comment #15 from Richard Guenther 2012-06-28 09:52:43 UTC --- (In reply to comment #14) > Ping? Can someone review my last patch? I think it's clean enough to be applied > (minus the TODO notes) and extra fixes can come separately later. Did you post it to gcc-patches? If so, ping there.