From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30892 invoked by alias); 1 Jun 2012 00:19:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 30883 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Jun 2012 00:19:53 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Jun 2012 00:19:41 +0000 From: "asharif at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug gcov-profile/53547] New: Changing the source file between -fprofile-generate and -fprofile-use can lead to performance degradation Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 00:19:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: gcov-profile X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: asharif at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-06/txt/msg00000.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53547 Bug #: 53547 Summary: Changing the source file between -fprofile-generate and -fprofile-use can lead to performance degradation Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: gcov-profile AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: asharif@gcc.gnu.org Created attachment 27536 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27536 Test case. Please take a look at the attached test case. gcc -O2 -fprofile-generate test.c rm -rf test.gcda && ./a.out gcc -O2 -fprofile-use -DSTALE test.c Note that with -DSTALE, a function is added which changes the function id ordering within the module. With this re-ordering, the profile data no longer matches up with the updated source file. What is worse is that the performance actually *drops* below that of regular -O2 (without -fprofile-use). This is because the summary information (sum_max, etc.) is still valid while the edge count is considered to be 0 for all edges. This leads to pessimistic inlining decisions. Here is a patch that fixes solves the performance loss: http://codereview.appspot.com/5989046/