From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-393603-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 3204 invoked by alias); 5 Jun 2012 10:02:42 -0000
Received: (qmail 3187 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Jun 2012 10:02:40 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Jun 2012 10:02:27 +0000
From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/53573] template type dependent name resolution broken
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 10:02:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: major
X-Bugzilla-Who: manu at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC
Message-ID: <bug-53573-4-VadAUZyo25@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-53573-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-53573-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-06/txt/msg00230.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D53573

Manuel L=C3=B3pez-Ib=C3=A1=C3=B1ez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |manu at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #7 from Manuel L=C3=B3pez-Ib=C3=A1=C3=B1ez <manu at gcc dot gnu=
.org> 2012-06-05 10:02:25 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> The suggested work around in the error message 'adding -fpermissive' to
> gcc-4.7.0 does not fix the problem as suggested by the error message. This
> would suggest the compiler is not displaying the correct error message fo=
r the
> problem.
>=20
> g++ -fpermissive test.cpp
>=20
> Still generates:
>=20
> test.cpp: In instantiation of =E2=80=98T f(T) [with T =3D int]=E2=80=99:
> test.cpp:27:9:   required from here
> test.cpp:18:12: error: =E2=80=98g=E2=80=99 was not declared in this scope=
, and no declarations
> were found by argument-dependent lookup at the point of instantiation
> [-fpermissive]
> test.cpp:21:5: note: =E2=80=98int g(int)=E2=80=99 declared here, later in=
 the translation unit
>=20

With GCC 4.8 revision 187148, -fpermissive generates a warning as it should.
However, -fpermissive is not meant to fix anything, it is just a work-aroun=
d to
make non-standard code compile.

I am not sure if this is a bug or not, so I am not touching the status.