From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-393565-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 23002 invoked by alias); 4 Jun 2012 17:13:36 -0000
Received: (qmail 22987 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Jun 2012 17:13:33 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 17:13:20 +0000
From: "keean@fry-it.com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/53573] template type dependent name resolution broken
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 17:13:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: major
X-Bugzilla-Who: keean@fry-it.com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-53573-4-w7Zrwlkmv5@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-53573-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-53573-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-06/txt/msg00192.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D53573

--- Comment #5 from Keean Schupke <keean@fry-it.com> 2012-06-04 17:13:18 UT=
C ---
The following program will apparently compile correctly, but will silently
produce incorrect results at runtime:



#include <iostream>

char g(char x) {
    return x - 1;
}

template <typename T> T f(T t) {
    return g(t);
}

int g(int x) {
    return x + 1;
}

main() {
    int x(1);
    int y(f(x));
    std::cout << y << "\n";
    int z(f<int>(x));
    std::cout << z << "\n";
}



This should print "2 2" but prints "0 0". Interestingly it also produces
incorrect results with gcc-4.6.3 and gcc-4.5.3. However the code below (whi=
ch
does not compile on gcc-4.7.0 does produce the correct results on gcc-4.6.3=
 and
gcc-4.5.3:



#include <iostream>

template <typename T> T f(T t) {
    return g(t);
}

char g(char x) {
    return x - 1;
}

int g(int x) {
    return x + 1;
}

main() {
    int x(1);
    int y(f(x));
    std::cout << y << "\n";
    int z(f<int>(x));
    std::cout << z << "\n";
}



So it looks like earlier versions of GCC relied on 'g' being undefined at t=
he
point of definition to defer binding until instantiation instead of looking=
 for
dependence on a template parameter. gcc-4.7.0 does not seem to do either.

One more example:



#include <iostream>

class A {};

A g(A x) {
    return x;
}

template <typename T> T f(T t) {
    return g(t);
}

int g(int x) {
    return x + 1;
}

main() {
    int x(1);
    int y(f(x));
    std::cout << y << "\n";
    int z(f<int>(x));
    std::cout << z << "\n";
}



generates the following compile error:

test.cpp: In function =E2=80=98T f(T) [with T =3D int]=E2=80=99:
test.cpp:35:11:   instantiated from here
test.cpp:26:12: error: could not convert =E2=80=98t=E2=80=99 from =E2=80=98=
int=E2=80=99 to =E2=80=98A=E2=80=99