From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-393610-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 22535 invoked by alias); 5 Jun 2012 11:07:36 -0000
Received: (qmail 22461 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Jun 2012 11:07:34 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Jun 2012 11:07:21 +0000
From: "fernando at info dot unlp.edu.ar" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/53580] Internal Segmentation fault in nested "omp parallel", "omp parallel for" and "omp parallel for reduction" Directives
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 11:07:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: fernando at info dot unlp.edu.ar
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC
Message-ID: <bug-53580-4-sTQw1lVrHG@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-53580-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-53580-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-06/txt/msg00237.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53580

Fernando G. Tinetti <fernando at info dot unlp.edu.ar> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |fernando at info dot
                   |                            |unlp.edu.ar

--- Comment #2 from Fernando G. Tinetti <fernando at info dot unlp.edu.ar> 2012-06-05 11:07:07 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I'll look at it, but note that your testcase is invalid OpenMP.

We saw this with Federico, and we agree in that the testcase is invalid OpenMP
code. Furthermore: 
1) the compiler message is right.
2) should the compiler report an error instead of a warning? (I don't know what
the compiler is required to report...).

Fernando.