From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5264 invoked by alias); 11 Jun 2012 10:29:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 5256 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Jun 2012 10:29:08 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 10:28:54 +0000 From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/53613] Cannot override a inline "= default" virtual destructor. Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 10:29:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status Resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-06/txt/msg00583.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53613 Jonathan Wakely changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-06-11 10:28:40 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Fixed on trunk by patch for PR 50043 > > Did this patch apply to 4.7 branch? PR 50043 shows a single commit to trunk and has Target Milestone 4.8.0, so no, it's only fixed on trunk. > I retested with 4.7 branch 20120610, The bug is still exist. Yes, and it probably won't be fixed on the release branch as it's not a regression. New features are not usually added to released versions. In any case, there's a simple workaround of adding explicit 'noexcept' specifiers, which will still work with 4.8 I'm marking this as a dup of PR 50043 as the failure to compile is a direct consequence of not implementing DR 1123 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 50043 ***