public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/53657] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [C++11] pair(pair&&) move constructor is non-trivial
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 12:39:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-53657-4-IrzTDigz0k@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-53657-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53657

Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #20 from Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-07-13 12:38:03 UTC ---

Thanks Paolo and Jonathan and Jason, this looks ready to go from an ABI
standpoint for 4.7.2.

Paolo, do we need to add any of the testcases in this PR to track regressions
here? Or at least make this less fragile as FE/lib changes going forward?


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-07-13 12:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-13 14:53 [Bug libstdc++/53657] New: " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-06-14  8:45 ` [Bug libstdc++/53657] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-06-14  9:15 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-06-14  9:18 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-06-14  9:40 ` [Bug libstdc++/53657] [4.7/4.8 Regression][C++11] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-06-14  9:41 ` [Bug libstdc++/53657] [C++11] " paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2012-06-14  9:44 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2012-06-14 10:59 ` [Bug libstdc++/53657] [4.7/4.8 Regression] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-06-14 13:18 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-06-19  9:31 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2012-06-20 15:05 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2012-06-20 15:11 ` daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
2012-06-20 15:16 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2012-06-20 15:21 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-06-20 15:24 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2012-06-20 15:27 ` daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
2012-06-20 15:27 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2012-06-20 15:31 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-07-13  9:05 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2012-07-13 12:39 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2012-07-13 12:44 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2012-07-13 12:55 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2012-07-15 15:08 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-53657-4-IrzTDigz0k@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).