From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-394243-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 17036 invoked by alias); 14 Jun 2012 08:45:05 -0000
Received: (qmail 16955 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Jun 2012 08:45:02 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 08:44:50 +0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/53657] [C++11] pair(pair&&) move constructor is non-trivial
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 08:45:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ABI
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status Last reconfirmed CC Ever Confirmed
Message-ID: <bug-53657-4-NZc1kYRKIe@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-53657-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-53657-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-06/txt/msg00870.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53657

Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2012-06-14
                 CC|                            |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-06-14 08:44:49 UTC ---
Can you list the known "broken" revisions?  I'm not sure what to best do, but
eventually fixing it even when that "breaks" the ABI on release branches might
be the best thing after all ...