From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7291 invoked by alias); 18 Jun 2012 11:09:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 7277 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Jun 2012 11:09:41 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 11:09:29 +0000 From: "matz at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug bootstrap/53681] s390 bootstrap failure since 187965 Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 11:09:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: major X-Bugzilla-Who: matz at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status Resolution Status Resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-06/txt/msg01189.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53681 Michael Matz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED Resolution|FIXED | Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #8 from Michael Matz 2012-06-18 11:08:49 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > ?! You appear to have added the call to mark_sym_for_renaming with your patch. Yikes! > Since it isn't mentioned in the changelog perhaps it is a leftover from > something else in your tree? So the solution is to revert that change? Yes, it was an unintended change (it must have been in my dev tree quite long, I don't remember doing it). It seems I haven't reviewed the file list of my commit message :-/ Sorry about that breakage. --- Comment #9 from Michael Matz 2012-06-18 11:09:28 UTC --- .