From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-394809-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 29345 invoked by alias); 21 Jun 2012 07:34:01 -0000
Received: (qmail 29335 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Jun 2012 07:34:00 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,TW_ZJ
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 07:33:48 +0000
From: "ubizjak at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/53706] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap failure due to "Invalid write of size 8 at 0xBDC35E: variable_htab_free (var-tracking.c:1418)
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 07:34:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: build, ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ubizjak at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.0
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-53706-4-ChT0I7h32F@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-53706-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-53706-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-06/txt/msg01436.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53706

--- Comment #10 from Uros Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> 2012-06-21 07:33:34 UTC ---
Patch that fixes all valgrind issues, but I have no idea if it is OK or not:

--cut here--
Index: var-tracking.c
===================================================================
--- var-tracking.c      (revision 188848)
+++ var-tracking.c      (working copy)
@@ -9126,11 +9126,7 @@ vt_emit_notes (void)
   dataflow_set_destroy (&cur);

   if (MAY_HAVE_DEBUG_INSNS)
-    {
-      free_alloc_pool (loc_exp_dep_pool);
-      loc_exp_dep_pool = NULL;
-      htab_delete (dropped_values);
-    }
+    htab_delete (dropped_values);

   emit_notes = false;
 }
@@ -9797,6 +9793,8 @@ vt_finalize (void)

   if (MAY_HAVE_DEBUG_INSNS)
     {
+      free_alloc_pool (loc_exp_dep_pool);
+      loc_exp_dep_pool = NULL;
       free_alloc_pool (valvar_pool);
       VEC_free (rtx, heap, preserved_values);
       cselib_finish ();
--cut here--