From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 537 invoked by alias); 30 Oct 2012 18:27:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 32643 invoked by uid 48); 30 Oct 2012 18:27:37 -0000 From: "bergner at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/53708] [4.8 Regression] Many failures of the objc tests with -O3 -fnext-runtime and -m32 Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 18:27:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: bergner at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.0 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-10/txt/msg02896.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53708 --- Comment #11 from Peter Bergner 2012-10-30 18:27:36 UTC --- Do you mean Richard Sandiford's comment regarding your patch and then your reply? http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-06/msg01229.html Hmmm, if attribute((__aligned__)) really only sets the minimum alignment value and we're free to increase it arbitrarily, then maybe it's GLIBC's fault for not being able to handle null values due to padding while processing the init_array?