From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8321 invoked by alias); 18 Jun 2012 09:40:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 8307 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Jun 2012 09:40:07 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 09:39:54 +0000 From: "ajmay81 at googlemail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/53714] New: false positive for -Wuninitialized Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 09:40:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ajmay81 at googlemail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-06/txt/msg01170.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D53714 Bug #: 53714 Summary: false positive for -Wuninitialized Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: ajmay81@googlemail.com Fortran code: subroutine test(na,nb,nc) implicit none integer, intent(in) :: na, nb, nc integer ia, ib, ic, itest do ia=3D1,na do ib=3D1,nb do ic=3D1,nc itest=3Dic enddo enddo enddo do ic=3D1,nc write (6,*) ic enddo end /opt/gcc/4.7.1/bin/gfortran -c -O1 -Wuninitialized test.f test.f: In function =E2=80=98test=E2=80=99: test.f:4:0: warning: =E2=80=98ic=E2=80=99 may be used uninitialized in this= function [-Wuninitialized] Not seen with zero optimization, but for -O1 and greater the compiler repor= ts that 'ic' may be uninitialized. Removing the do-loop at the end of the subroutine removes the warning, even though it seems unrelated to the location of the alleged uninitialized case. Removing either of the ia or ib loops (which do nothing) also removes the warning. Seen with 4.7.1 built from source.