From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-394646-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 14168 invoked by alias); 19 Jun 2012 17:36:44 -0000
Received: (qmail 14064 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Jun 2012 17:36:43 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 17:36:29 +0000
From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/53718] [4.7/4.8 regression] [OOP] gfortran generates asm label twice in the same output file
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 17:36:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.7.2
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-53718-4-9p2wqu2FtD@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-53718-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-53718-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-06/txt/msg01273.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53718

--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> 2012-06-19 17:36:26 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Indeed the following patch, which is practically a revert of the trans-decl.c
> part of the above commit, makes the errors go away: ...

Confirmed for the tests in this PR (as well as the test in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46313#c25 ) without regression.

Note that without the patch the tests fail only with -O0, but not with the
optimization I have tried (-O1 or -O3).

It would be nice if someone could compile gfortran.dg/select_type_12.f03 (and
the tests) through valgrind (I cannot do it under darwin).