From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7851 invoked by alias); 11 Sep 2012 15:57:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 7839 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Sep 2012 15:57:50 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:57:37 +0000 From: "janus at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/53718] [4.7/4.8 regression] [OOP] gfortran generates asm label twice in the same output file Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:57:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid, wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: janus at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.7.2 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-09/txt/msg00874.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53718 --- Comment #11 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-11 15:57:35 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > My suspicious is that one of Richard's commits in May fixed the issue. In turn > that probably means that backing out the patch for PR50640 only works for 4.7 > and not for 4.8 I assume you mean the other way around, right? The patch of comment 7 *does* work on trunk. I just checked that applying it on the 4.7 branch revives the old ICE on select_type_12. So, should we apply the patch only on trunk for now?