public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/53787] Possible IPA-SRA / IPA-CP improvement
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 15:59:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-53787-4-QZFwCD3CT1@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-53787-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53787

--- Comment #11 from Martin Jambor <jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-08-30 15:58:40 UTC ---
The aggregate functions and their use in inlining/ipa-cp heuristics is
in, at least with my PHI predicate computing patch which I
re-submitted today we even get a predicate for known loop iterations
for function init today.  This means that even today the function in
your app should be inlined much more likely.  In order to propagate
stuff without inlining, IPA-CP must be enhanced which is something I
am still only working on.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-08-30 15:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-27 17:26 [Bug lto/53787] New: Possible lto improvement izamyatin at gmail dot com
2012-06-27 17:39 ` [Bug lto/53787] " dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2012-06-27 17:57 ` izamyatin at gmail dot com
2012-06-27 20:03 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2012-06-28  8:17 ` izamyatin at gmail dot com
2012-06-28  8:22 ` izamyatin at gmail dot com
2012-06-28 10:08 ` [Bug tree-optimization/53787] Possible IPA-SRA / IPA-CP improvement rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-07-19 19:10 ` izamyatin at gmail dot com
2012-07-20 19:59 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-07-26 22:49 ` steven at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-07-27  9:35 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-08-30 15:59 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2012-11-07 15:56 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-08 14:43 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-22 15:32 ` ysrumyan at gmail dot com
2013-01-22 15:33 ` ysrumyan at gmail dot com
2013-01-25 18:33 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-02-14 17:16 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-02-28 14:26 ` izamyatin at gmail dot com
2014-05-23 15:52 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-53787-4-QZFwCD3CT1@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).