From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8701 invoked by alias); 28 Jun 2012 10:00:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 8689 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Jun 2012 10:00:16 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 09:59:58 +0000 From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/53790] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE on dereferencing a extern union in asm statement Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 10:00:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: major X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.6.4 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status Keywords Last reconfirmed AssignedTo Ever Confirmed Summary Target Milestone Known to fail Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-06/txt/msg01860.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53790 Richard Guenther changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |ice-on-valid-code Last reconfirmed| |2012-06-28 AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Summary|ICE on dereferencing a |[4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] |extern union in asm |ICE on dereferencing a |statement |extern union in asm | |statement Target Milestone|--- |4.6.4 Known to fail| |4.8.0 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2012-06-28 09:59:40 UTC --- Confirmed. There is nothing invalid here, you can take the address of such variable - you just cannot inspect it. Of course that is what inlining exposes here (and via MEM_REF we get to see the external decl). Hmhm. I'll look at it.