From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-395344-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 8314 invoked by alias); 29 Jun 2012 15:05:01 -0000
Received: (qmail 8297 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Jun 2012 15:05:00 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 15:04:47 +0000
From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/53796] I/O INQUIRE of RECL:  If not specified in OPEN,  the default value should be returned (sequential access)
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 15:05:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-53796-4-uzESpRl3De@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-53796-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-53796-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-06/txt/msg01971.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D53796

--- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-06-29 15=
:04:47 UTC ---
Steve Lionel points at the following:

"If an error condition occurs during execution of an INQUIRE statement, all=
 of
the inquiry speci=0Cer variables become unde=0Cned, except for variables in=
 the
IOSTAT=3D and IOMSG=3D speci=0Cers (if any)."

Thus, if the RECL of the connection is larger than huge(kind(recl_var)), one
has to raise an error.

The question is only how the default should be handled. As written, I do not
really understand the current algorithm. Namely, whether we effectively
implement huge(0_int64) by extending the chunks. Or whether we apply a lower
boundary by default.

Additionally, we have the problem that the internal IO descriptor is only of
kind int32 (cf. PR 44292).