From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10228 invoked by alias); 25 Feb 2014 17:57:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10182 invoked by uid 48); 25 Feb 2014 17:57:30 -0000 From: "jason at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug lto/53808] Undefined symbol when building a library with lto Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 17:57:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: lto X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jason at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-02/txt/msg02539.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53808 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #6) > I just tried to reproduce the bug before checking my patch in for 4.9, and > couldn't; my patch seems to make no difference to the cgraph output for > def.cpp. ...but it does make a difference to undef.cpp. Never mind.