From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-395435-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 31218 invoked by alias); 2 Jul 2012 08:01:40 -0000
Received: (qmail 31207 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Jul 2012 08:01:39 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,TW_TM
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 08:01:26 +0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/53812] lower_stmt (4.6), verify_gimple_stmt (4.7.0, 4.7.1)
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 08:01:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status Last reconfirmed CC Ever Confirmed
Message-ID: <bug-53812-4-5i8b2Zk4SF@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-53812-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-53812-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-07/txt/msg00021.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53812

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2012-07-02
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-07-02 08:01:25 UTC ---
Simplified testcase:
struct T { T () : t(0) {}; int t; ~T (); };
struct S { void *operator [] (T); };
void bar (S &, void *, void *);

void
foo (S &x, T &y)
{
  bar (x, &&l1, &&l2);
l1:
  goto *x[y];
l2:
  bar (x, &&l1, &&l2);
}