From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3140 invoked by alias); 30 Jun 2012 06:33:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 3128 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Jun 2012 06:33:23 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 30 Jun 2012 06:33:10 +0000 From: "ai.azuma at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/53816] New: internal compiler error: tree check: expected field_decl, have identifier_node in fixed_type_or_null, at cp/class.c:6419, with -std=c++11 option Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 06:33:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ai.azuma at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-06/txt/msg02005.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53816 Bug #: 53816 Summary: internal compiler error: tree check: expected field_decl, have identifier_node in fixed_type_or_null, at cp/class.c:6419, with -std=c++11 option Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: ai.azuma@gmail.com Created attachment 27721 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27721 preprocessed source file The attached code looks innocent but causes ICE with GCC 4.8.0 20120624 (experimental) and `-std=c++11' option, although it doesn't rely on any C++11 feature. And without `-std=c++11' option, it successfully compiles. Note that the attached code successfully compiles with GCC 4.6.4 20120622 (prerelease) and 4.7.2 20120623 (prerelease), regardless of whether `-std=c++0x' option is used.