From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25059 invoked by alias); 2 Jul 2012 10:15:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 25046 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Jul 2012 10:15:48 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 10:15:36 +0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/53829] Trivial static initializers are created for initialization with result of trivial static inline functions Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 10:15:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-07/txt/msg00052.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53829 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-07-02 10:15:35 UTC --- I guess we'd need to do some discovery of potential constexpr functions (that aren't marked that way though), use some bit other than DECL_DECLARED_CONSTEXPR_P for those, pass some flag from maybe_constant_value down to potential_constant_expression and cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr (in addition to allow_non_constant or perhaps as enum instead of bool of allow_non_constant) and with optimize treat also !DECL_DECLARED_CONSTEXPR_P && DECL_CONSTEXPR_LIKE_P calls. Or is maybe_constant_value ever used to decide if a C++ program is valid or not?