public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/53852] [4.8 Regression] -ftree-loop-linear: large compile time / memory usage
Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 12:44:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-53852-4-DDsYaHafHb@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-53852-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53852

Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Component|middle-end                  |tree-optimization
      Known to work|                            |4.7.1
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.8.0
            Summary|-ftree-loop-linear: large   |[4.8 Regression]
                   |compile time / memory usage |-ftree-loop-linear: large
                   |                            |compile time / memory usage

--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-07-04 12:43:48 UTC ---
4.7 compiles this quickly and without too much memory.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-07-04 12:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-04 11:19 [Bug middle-end/53852] New: " Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2012-07-04 11:54 ` [Bug middle-end/53852] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-07-04 12:11 ` matz at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-07-04 12:18 ` Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2012-07-04 12:44 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2012-08-22 11:58 ` [Bug tree-optimization/53852] [4.8 Regression] " Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2012-12-06 16:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-13 13:00 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-02-07  9:05 ` Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2013-02-19 20:48 ` law at redhat dot com
2013-03-22 14:43 ` [Bug tree-optimization/53852] [4.8/4.9 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-05-31 10:58 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-10-16  9:51 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-01-23  7:30 ` law at redhat dot com
2014-05-22  9:02 ` [Bug tree-optimization/53852] [4.8/4.9/4.10 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-19 13:41 ` [Bug tree-optimization/53852] [4.8/4.9/5 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-23  8:23 ` [Bug tree-optimization/53852] [4.8/4.9/5/6 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-26 20:13 ` [Bug tree-optimization/53852] [4.9/5/6 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-26 20:37 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-08-28  4:28 ` Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2015-08-28 14:29 ` spop at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-09-02 22:38 ` spop at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-09-09  4:23 ` spop at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-53852-4-DDsYaHafHb@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).