public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c/53874] New: -Wswitch-enum not properly working with bitfields
@ 2012-07-06 13:06 jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com
  2012-07-06 13:09 ` [Bug c/53874] " jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com @ 2012-07-06 13:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53874

             Bug #: 53874
           Summary: -Wswitch-enum not properly working with bitfields
    Classification: Unclassified
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.6.3
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c
        AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com


typedef enum
{
    A,
    B,
    C
} tEnum;


typedef struct t_A
{
 tEnum         my_enum:4;
} tA;


int test(tA * bla)
{
 switch(bla->my_enum)
 {
     default:
         return 0;
 }
}



I expect the compiler to complain:

test-enum.c:23: warning: enumeration value `A' not handled in switch
test-enum.c:23: warning: enumeration value `B' not handled in switch
test-enum.c:23: warning: enumeration value `C' not handled in switch

I verified this works in GCC 3.4 but not in GCC 4.6.

Thanks


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/53874] -Wswitch-enum not properly working with bitfields
  2012-07-06 13:06 [Bug c/53874] New: -Wswitch-enum not properly working with bitfields jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com
@ 2012-07-06 13:09 ` jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com
  2014-05-28 19:18 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com @ 2012-07-06 13:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53874

--- Comment #1 from Jan Smets <jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com> 2012-07-06 13:09:29 UTC ---
And if the :4 is removed, then it works as expected.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/53874] -Wswitch-enum not properly working with bitfields
  2012-07-06 13:06 [Bug c/53874] New: -Wswitch-enum not properly working with bitfields jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com
  2012-07-06 13:09 ` [Bug c/53874] " jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com
@ 2014-05-28 19:18 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-09-19 13:30 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-09-24 17:24 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: manu at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-05-28 19:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53874

Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2014-05-28
                 CC|                            |manu at gcc dot gnu.org
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #2 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed. Related to PR61344. Clang does print a warning:

test2.c:17:10: warning: enumeration values 'A', 'B', and 'C' not explicitly
handled in switch [-Wswitch-enum]
  switch(bla->my_enum)
         ^

(and a better warning than gcc, printing three times the same warning is not
very nice).
>From gcc-bugs-return-452755-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed May 28 19:36:18 2014
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-452755-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 8994 invoked by alias); 28 May 2014 19:36:18 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 8941 invoked by uid 48); 28 May 2014 19:36:15 -0000
From: "carrot at google dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/61202] gcc generates invalid sqdmulh instruction
Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 19:36:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: carrot at google dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-61202-4-JoS3ClmClV@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-61202-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-61202-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-05/txt/msg02447.txt.bz2
Content-length: 558

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?ida202

Carrot <carrot at google dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #6 from Carrot <carrot at google dot com> ---
(In reply to java4ada from comment #5)
> Will this bug cover 4.8.x as well? (or file separate bug for 4.8.x)

Yes. I have committed the patch to 4.8 branch.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/53874] -Wswitch-enum not properly working with bitfields
  2012-07-06 13:06 [Bug c/53874] New: -Wswitch-enum not properly working with bitfields jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com
  2012-07-06 13:09 ` [Bug c/53874] " jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com
  2014-05-28 19:18 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-09-19 13:30 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-09-24 17:24 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-09-19 13:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53874

Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
           Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org      |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
   Target Milestone|---                         |5.0

--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Patch I've just posted should fix this as well.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/53874] -Wswitch-enum not properly working with bitfields
  2012-07-06 13:06 [Bug c/53874] New: -Wswitch-enum not properly working with bitfields jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2014-09-19 13:30 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-09-24 17:24 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-09-24 17:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53874

--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Wed Sep 24 17:23:56 2014
New Revision: 215559

URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215559&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
    PR c/61405
    PR c/53874
gcc/
    * asan.c (maybe_instrument_call): Add default case.
    * ipa-pure-const.c (special_builtin_state): Likewise.
    * predict.c (expr_expected_value_1): Likewise.
    * lto-streamer-out.c (write_symbol): Initialize variable.
gcc/c-family/
    * c-common.h (struct c_common_resword): Don't define CPP_KEYWORD.
gcc/c/
    * c-parser.c: Don't define CPP_KEYWORD.
    (c_parser_switch_statement): Pass original type to c_finish_case.
    * c-tree.h (c_finish_case): Update declaration.
    * c-typeck.c (c_finish_case): Add TYPE parameter.  Pass it
    conditionally to c_do_switch_warnings.
gcc/cp/
    * semantics.c (finish_switch_cond): Call unlowered_expr_type.
    * tree.c (bot_manip): Add default case.
    * parser.c (cp_parser_primary_expression): Cast the controlling
    expression of a switch to an int.
    (cp_parser_unqualified_id): Likewise.
gcc/testsuite/
    * c-c++-common/pr53874.c: New test.
    * c-c++-common/pr61405.c: New test.
libcpp/
    * include/cpplib.h (enum cpp_ttype): Define CPP_KEYWORD.

Added:
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/pr53874.c
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/pr61405.c
Modified:
    trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/asan.c
    trunk/gcc/c-family/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/c-family/c-common.h
    trunk/gcc/c/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/c/c-parser.c
    trunk/gcc/c/c-tree.h
    trunk/gcc/c/c-typeck.c
    trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/cp/parser.c
    trunk/gcc/cp/semantics.c
    trunk/gcc/cp/tree.c
    trunk/gcc/ipa-pure-const.c
    trunk/gcc/lto-streamer-out.c
    trunk/gcc/predict.c
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
    trunk/libcpp/ChangeLog
    trunk/libcpp/include/cpplib.h


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2014-09-24 17:24 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-07-06 13:06 [Bug c/53874] New: -Wswitch-enum not properly working with bitfields jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com
2012-07-06 13:09 ` [Bug c/53874] " jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com
2014-05-28 19:18 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-09-19 13:30 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-09-24 17:24 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).