* [Bug driver/53883] GCC 4.7.1 doesn't build on Mac OS X 10.4.11 Tiger/PowerPC (32-bit)
2012-07-07 2:15 [Bug driver/53883] New: GCC 4.7.1 doesn't build on Mac OS X 10.4.11 Tiger/PowerPC (32-bit) dwalker07 at yahoo dot com
@ 2012-07-07 2:21 ` dwalker07 at yahoo dot com
2012-07-07 12:47 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: dwalker07 at yahoo dot com @ 2012-07-07 2:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53883
--- Comment #1 from Daryle Walker <dwalker07 at yahoo dot com> 2012-07-07 02:20:51 UTC ---
Created attachment 27756
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27756
The log MacPorts left when trying to build GCC 4.7.1.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug driver/53883] GCC 4.7.1 doesn't build on Mac OS X 10.4.11 Tiger/PowerPC (32-bit)
2012-07-07 2:15 [Bug driver/53883] New: GCC 4.7.1 doesn't build on Mac OS X 10.4.11 Tiger/PowerPC (32-bit) dwalker07 at yahoo dot com
2012-07-07 2:21 ` [Bug driver/53883] " dwalker07 at yahoo dot com
@ 2012-07-07 12:47 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-07-08 20:45 ` [Bug driver/53883] GCC 4.7.1 doesn't build on Mac OS X 10.4.11 Tiger/PowerPC (32-bit), at least with MacPorts dwalker07 at yahoo dot com
` (7 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-07-07 12:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53883
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-07-07 12:46:54 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> (Should I try building GCC 4.7.1 straight from you guys, without going through
> MacPorts?)
Yes, probably.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug driver/53883] GCC 4.7.1 doesn't build on Mac OS X 10.4.11 Tiger/PowerPC (32-bit), at least with MacPorts
2012-07-07 2:15 [Bug driver/53883] New: GCC 4.7.1 doesn't build on Mac OS X 10.4.11 Tiger/PowerPC (32-bit) dwalker07 at yahoo dot com
2012-07-07 2:21 ` [Bug driver/53883] " dwalker07 at yahoo dot com
2012-07-07 12:47 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-07-08 20:45 ` dwalker07 at yahoo dot com
2012-07-10 1:32 ` dwalker07 at yahoo dot com
` (6 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: dwalker07 at yahoo dot com @ 2012-07-08 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53883
--- Comment #3 from Daryle Walker <dwalker07 at yahoo dot com> 2012-07-08 20:45:06 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > (Should I try building GCC 4.7.1 straight from you guys, without going through
> > MacPorts?)
>
> Yes, probably.
I'm working on that now....
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug driver/53883] GCC 4.7.1 doesn't build on Mac OS X 10.4.11 Tiger/PowerPC (32-bit), at least with MacPorts
2012-07-07 2:15 [Bug driver/53883] New: GCC 4.7.1 doesn't build on Mac OS X 10.4.11 Tiger/PowerPC (32-bit) dwalker07 at yahoo dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2012-07-08 20:45 ` [Bug driver/53883] GCC 4.7.1 doesn't build on Mac OS X 10.4.11 Tiger/PowerPC (32-bit), at least with MacPorts dwalker07 at yahoo dot com
@ 2012-07-10 1:32 ` dwalker07 at yahoo dot com
2012-07-10 1:34 ` dwalker07 at yahoo dot com
` (5 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: dwalker07 at yahoo dot com @ 2012-07-10 1:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53883
--- Comment #4 from Daryle Walker <dwalker07 at yahoo dot com> 2012-07-10 01:32:12 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > (In reply to comment #0)
> > > (Should I try building GCC 4.7.1 straight from you guys, without going through
> > > MacPorts?)
> >
> > Yes, probably.
>
> I'm working on that now....
...And here's what I tried:
//---
svn co svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/tags/gcc_4_7_1_release gcc
cd gcc
nano README
nano contrib/gcc_update
./contrib/gcc_update --touch
cd ..
mkdir gcc-obj
cd gcc-obj
../gcc/configure --with-gmp=/opt/local --with-mpfr=/opt/local
--with-mpc=/opt/local
make
//---
(I'm using GMP, MPFR, and MPC from MacPorts. Note that it used the system
compiler, Apple's GCC 4.0.1, and not anything from MacPorts for the first
compiler phase.) It didn't build all the way through; here's the last few
lines:
//---
checking for gawk... awk
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
checking for --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs... no
checking for style of include used by make... GNU
checking for powerpc-apple-darwin8.11.0-gcc...
/Users/daryle/Documents/Projects/GCC/gcc-obj/./gcc/xgcc
-B/Users/daryle/Documents/Projects/GCC/gcc-obj/./gcc/
-B/usr/local/powerpc-apple-darwin8.11.0/bin/
-B/usr/local/powerpc-apple-darwin8.11.0/lib/ -isystem
/usr/local/powerpc-apple-darwin8.11.0/include -isystem
/usr/local/powerpc-apple-darwin8.11.0/sys-include -m64
checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out
checking whether the C compiler works... configure: error: in
`/Users/daryle/Documents/Projects/GCC/gcc-obj/powerpc-apple-darwin8.11.0/ppc64/libquadmath':
configure: error: cannot run C compiled programs.
If you meant to cross compile, use `--host'.
See `config.log' for more details.
make[1]: *** [configure-target-libquadmath] Error 1
make: *** [all] Error 2
[daryle:gcc-obj]$ l
//---
It seems that it tried to build "libquadmath" thinking all PowerPC systems are
64-bit, while mine is 32-bit. I didn't reach the error I reported with
MacPorts' build yet. Is there any way to force libquadmath to compile in
32-bit mode? (If that's impossible, is it skippable?) I'll try to attach the
"config.log" file.
I'll retry make when you guys let me know how to fix up libquadmath.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug driver/53883] GCC 4.7.1 doesn't build on Mac OS X 10.4.11 Tiger/PowerPC (32-bit), at least with MacPorts
2012-07-07 2:15 [Bug driver/53883] New: GCC 4.7.1 doesn't build on Mac OS X 10.4.11 Tiger/PowerPC (32-bit) dwalker07 at yahoo dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2012-07-10 1:32 ` dwalker07 at yahoo dot com
@ 2012-07-10 1:34 ` dwalker07 at yahoo dot com
2012-07-10 6:36 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: dwalker07 at yahoo dot com @ 2012-07-10 1:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53883
--- Comment #5 from Daryle Walker <dwalker07 at yahoo dot com> 2012-07-10 01:34:10 UTC ---
Created attachment 27767
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27767
The log from the failed make described in Comment 4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug driver/53883] GCC 4.7.1 doesn't build on Mac OS X 10.4.11 Tiger/PowerPC (32-bit), at least with MacPorts
2012-07-07 2:15 [Bug driver/53883] New: GCC 4.7.1 doesn't build on Mac OS X 10.4.11 Tiger/PowerPC (32-bit) dwalker07 at yahoo dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2012-07-10 1:34 ` dwalker07 at yahoo dot com
@ 2012-07-10 6:36 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2012-07-14 18:52 ` dwalker07 at yahoo dot com
` (3 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: schwab@linux-m68k.org @ 2012-07-10 6:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53883
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> 2012-07-10 06:36:03 UTC ---
*-darwin8 assumes ppc64 multilib, try --disable-multilib.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug driver/53883] GCC 4.7.1 doesn't build on Mac OS X 10.4.11 Tiger/PowerPC (32-bit), at least with MacPorts
2012-07-07 2:15 [Bug driver/53883] New: GCC 4.7.1 doesn't build on Mac OS X 10.4.11 Tiger/PowerPC (32-bit) dwalker07 at yahoo dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2012-07-10 6:36 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
@ 2012-07-14 18:52 ` dwalker07 at yahoo dot com
2012-08-05 16:52 ` dwalker07 at yahoo dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: dwalker07 at yahoo dot com @ 2012-07-14 18:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53883
--- Comment #7 from Daryle Walker <dwalker07 at yahoo dot com> 2012-07-14 18:52:42 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> *-darwin8 assumes ppc64 multilib, try --disable-multilib.
I added that for my second try:
//===
cd ..
gnutar -cjf gcc-obj.tar.bz2 gcc-obj
rm -r gcc-obj
mkdir gcc-obj
cd gcc-obj
../gcc/configure --with-gmp=/opt/local --with-mpfr=/opt/local
--with-mpc=/opt/local --disable-multilib
make | tee ~/making1.txt
make | tee -a ~/making1.txt
make -k check | tee -a ~/making1.txt
//===
I ran the main "make" twice because I thought it ended by timing out. But I
think it just succeeded, since the second one was a bunch of no-ops.
The third "make," for testing, is still going on. So far, I've been getting
all FAIL. (I don't have the "autogen" program.) The main compile took over a
day; how long will the testing take? Should I just quit it and "make install"?
Or install "autogen" and test again instead?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug driver/53883] GCC 4.7.1 doesn't build on Mac OS X 10.4.11 Tiger/PowerPC (32-bit), at least with MacPorts
2012-07-07 2:15 [Bug driver/53883] New: GCC 4.7.1 doesn't build on Mac OS X 10.4.11 Tiger/PowerPC (32-bit) dwalker07 at yahoo dot com
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2012-07-14 18:52 ` dwalker07 at yahoo dot com
@ 2012-08-05 16:52 ` dwalker07 at yahoo dot com
2012-08-05 17:09 ` dwalker07 at yahoo dot com
2012-08-05 17:13 ` dwalker07 at yahoo dot com
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: dwalker07 at yahoo dot com @ 2012-08-05 16:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53883
--- Comment #8 from Daryle Walker <dwalker07 at yahoo dot com> 2012-08-05 16:51:57 UTC ---
I haven't check the results of the testing-make yet, but I tried sending the
results in.
//===
nano your_commentary.txt
../gcc/contrib/test_summary -p your_commentary.txt -m
gcc-testresults@gcc.gnu.org | sh
//===
The second command gave an error of "postdrop: warning: unable to look up
public/pickup: No such file or directory\n" early on. I left it running for
several days, then Control-C it because I was tired of waiting. Trying to
command again with a pipe to "more" or to the console had the script
immediately end; I guess the first call worked long enough to purge the test
files.
My "your_commentary.txt" was:
//===
This is my attempt to compile GCC 4.7 directly, instead of using MacPorts,
as part of my bug report 53883. I'm not sure if it passed or failed.
<http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53883>
//===
I don't know if you guys received anything.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug driver/53883] GCC 4.7.1 doesn't build on Mac OS X 10.4.11 Tiger/PowerPC (32-bit), at least with MacPorts
2012-07-07 2:15 [Bug driver/53883] New: GCC 4.7.1 doesn't build on Mac OS X 10.4.11 Tiger/PowerPC (32-bit) dwalker07 at yahoo dot com
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2012-08-05 16:52 ` dwalker07 at yahoo dot com
@ 2012-08-05 17:09 ` dwalker07 at yahoo dot com
2012-08-05 17:13 ` dwalker07 at yahoo dot com
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: dwalker07 at yahoo dot com @ 2012-08-05 17:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53883
--- Comment #9 from Daryle Walker <dwalker07 at yahoo dot com> 2012-08-05 17:09:00 UTC ---
Created attachment 27945
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27945
Output from running make, for gcc and tests, with tee
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug driver/53883] GCC 4.7.1 doesn't build on Mac OS X 10.4.11 Tiger/PowerPC (32-bit), at least with MacPorts
2012-07-07 2:15 [Bug driver/53883] New: GCC 4.7.1 doesn't build on Mac OS X 10.4.11 Tiger/PowerPC (32-bit) dwalker07 at yahoo dot com
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2012-08-05 17:09 ` dwalker07 at yahoo dot com
@ 2012-08-05 17:13 ` dwalker07 at yahoo dot com
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: dwalker07 at yahoo dot com @ 2012-08-05 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53883
--- Comment #10 from Daryle Walker <dwalker07 at yahoo dot com> 2012-08-05 17:13:08 UTC ---
I've added attachment 27945, a bzip2 archive of the "making1.txt" file. That
file is the "tee" results of the three "make" runs given in comment 7
(http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53883#c7). The third "make" run
is the testing run, and starts around line 21,938 of the file.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread