From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 443DD3856968; Thu, 11 May 2023 12:19:45 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 443DD3856968
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1683807585;
	bh=weGbseIVNQCuOgc5uWlJu9FaiFnKU31E6uLHfOeYsdk=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=ySPMs62BYMfbO215TabliZ88j7Ld+JIJD6WplkVuIp9BJe+d4z1es5Xcjau5A7P5Y
	 iJzuZHKq6KY+6DAkE8ZSfUO4YDbw/2fpFzB79K7c5x0BkhdGLw+R3kLEd2vG9gSlAX
	 Xct6M3p70d88HlF3CwL2SL6D6StRhXwFvpHxQicc=
From: "lh_mouse at 126 dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/53929] [meta-bug] -masm=intel with global symbol
Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 12:19:44 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.6.3
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: assemble-failure, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: minor
X-Bugzilla-Who: lh_mouse at 126 dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-53929-4-8iwAGSLObQ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-53929-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-53929-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D53929

--- Comment #21 from LIU Hao <lh_mouse at 126 dot com> ---
(In reply to jbeulich from comment #20)
> This is assembly; I don't see how (dis)similarity with C would matter. I
> also don't see how your example is any different in this regard from
>=20
>     mov eax, "symbol"
>=20
> which gas has been supporting for quite some time.

oh really? I thought it would have to be implemented. If it's readily
available, we can start making use of it right now.=