From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id BA2683857702; Thu,  4 May 2023 13:14:48 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org BA2683857702
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1683206088;
	bh=MR231coPx/boUD412DzeKmeFpPGUBE+/ilU20yFrY8k=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=dFhBmxovtjnHj5A42Ys1G7ed2Ab9goLDOkcfgTNU+eehE013Ko/CX7Sm76ORoBhRw
	 ZMkRTCQf+Gew7XHma9cPzNEn3XSsZ3tU/7ytIDFJsZZdp3WaZoV0UnaSkd9cSNvpvd
	 4/PsgUSXAV8sqcHQGH5X2rblwf/Q8cfam2FG76WQ=
From: "lh_mouse at 126 dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/53929] [meta-bug] -masm=intel with global symbol
Date: Thu, 04 May 2023 13:14:47 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.6.3
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: assemble-failure, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: minor
X-Bugzilla-Who: lh_mouse at 126 dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-53929-4-m4ANIBTn9X@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-53929-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-53929-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D53929

--- Comment #18 from LIU Hao <lh_mouse at 126 dot com> ---
Would it make any sense to have GAS be more permissive about such labels,

1. unconditionally? or
2. when input is from a pipe? or
3. when a special option is in effect e.g. `--output-from-gcc`?=