public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "law at redhat dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug debug/53948] [4.8 Regression] Assignment line missing for -O0 -g
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 20:47:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-53948-4-8in7x67ZL7@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-53948-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53948

--- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> 2013-02-07 20:46:10 UTC ---
Also note the patch, to the best of my knowledge, was not ping'd.  As a
regression (and a P1 regression I might add) I would have expected Steven to
ping the patch and/or Jakub to have pushed harder for reversion of the original
patch which caused the regression per our patch reversion policy.

Either way it was not handled well. 


WRT on-the side datastructures.  The on-the-side structure here is the existing
tree structures.  At some point all the linkage between RTL structures and tree
structures needs to be sorted out, but I don't think now is the time nor do I
think the amount of usage here justifies using a precious bit in our base rtl
structure.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-02-07 20:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-13  8:51 [Bug debug/53948] New: " jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com
2012-07-13  9:12 ` [Bug debug/53948] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-07-16 19:37 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-07-16 19:49 ` steven at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-07-16 20:23 ` steven at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-07-16 21:58 ` steven at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-09-19 13:45 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-02-07 20:05 ` law at redhat dot com
2013-02-07 20:24 ` stevenb.gcc at gmail dot com
2013-02-07 20:41 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-02-07 20:47 ` law at redhat dot com [this message]
2013-02-08  8:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-02-08 13:20 ` law at redhat dot com
2013-02-08 13:46 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-02-08 20:04 ` law at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-02-08 20:05 ` law at redhat dot com
2013-02-08 20:07 ` law at redhat dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-53948-4-8in7x67ZL7@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).