From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 26DC13864824; Mon, 19 Feb 2024 13:44:30 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 26DC13864824 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1708350271; bh=vwgYFAOYaNYHnz4xr1RRLgy34X2u5wWW7Oll9msw+Cs=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=rjXi8yCiiZF8YF78FTi0tdzAMTc9y9ALzmkC6/i3mjoQXnPBK+kV4QqLWhoDK8Bcd aLrPRWrmGFyKK1ddzZNiShbRaxG0eMrTEuNdDOVm42JtD47DdwsP/+QCedOpK8IVg/ dn20IhWK/LG49lkq1G8+M9Hag3p4FnSXma5ZmkBU= From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/54052] [11/12/13 Regression] g++ takes excessive time in opt and generate phase; can lead to Segmentation Fault when not enough memory available Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 13:44:30 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.6.3 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: compile-time-hog, memory-hog X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: short_desc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D54052 Richard Biener changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|[11/12/13/14 Regression] |[11/12/13 Regression] g++ |g++ takes excessive time in |takes excessive time in opt |opt and generate phase; can |and generate phase; can |lead to Segmentation Fault |lead to Segmentation Fault |when not enough memory |when not enough memory |available |available --- Comment #15 from Richard Biener --- We're back to GCC 10 performance on trunk now.=