From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-397208-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 15501 invoked by alias); 23 Jul 2012 13:45:13 -0000
Received: (qmail 15480 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Jul 2012 13:45:10 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 13:44:49 +0000
From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/54072] BOZ with -std=f2008: wrongly accepted to TRANSFER/ABS/...; two BOZ not rejected for IOR/IEOR/IAND
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 13:45:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-54072-4-KbWRU0LLkL@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-54072-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-54072-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-07/txt/msg01794.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54072

--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-07-23 13:44:47 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Misleading error message:
>    Error: Extension: BOZ literal at (1) outside a DATA statement and outside
>           INT/REAL/DBLE/CMPLX 
> As comment 0 shows, there are now many more intrinsics where BOZ literals are
> allowed. The message text should be updated.

http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gfortran/BOZ-literal-constants.html has a similar
issue: It also only lists the 4 Fortran 2003 intrinsics; one should mention
that some additional Fortran 2008 intrinsics also accept BOZ.