From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id D91553857735; Thu,  1 Jun 2023 07:32:15 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D91553857735
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1685604735;
	bh=E4+SYCbTl/z9OW3214nBk5a2GCXi53n0ImpORk/l4F0=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=vzdKxU4uZtov5aOT7r6kiiZdwf5yyqmQstGVigGAnsZIMNlQsOwMS7YUdv+M9ykry
	 +KAZOAmVBBhYa1M9Yw4FBVBvV4JESzDtn0KC3r5BZufuvwhjvMpbz186S2iN2OdASS
	 Dr7jVAvbhlWY3ZVDHFOQSQTZedTvyykZp1tnqdHo=
From: "klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/54089] [SH] Refactor shift patterns
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2023 07:32:13 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-54089-4-Bf9ZCMMeGd@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-54089-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-54089-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D54089

Alexander Klepikov <klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |klepikov.alex+bugs at gmai=
l dot co
                   |                            |m

--- Comment #48 from Alexander Klepikov <klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot co=
m> ---
Let's continue discussion we started here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D49263

I've found that my patch catches integer division. In short, it appears to =
work
unpredictable. It looks like there's no easy way to catch right shift.=