From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 6B0983858C5F; Tue,  6 Jun 2023 16:10:57 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6B0983858C5F
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1686067857;
	bh=564+aEsfv8HISI6PTtKinGmxhj9e+V49V/kWiRaSNS4=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=AX2kB1nP4IFVbpco2YjfstiQ3JK1/jNlslQDFcCW1tfo0lYeNQxQkJgem6Mk3pTpB
	 L5walX+sZl/kVgii4B8tMFtZsJKMRQL/FwvYDcYhXr6T3yrAUCBMLqhEBvwsN5Znci
	 vF7Enh6nY/19VYRuvf+WNHZUspvw72JMR37bRITw=
From: "klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/54089] [SH] Refactor shift patterns
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2023 16:10:54 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-54089-4-FmoOaecBlo@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-54089-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-54089-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D54089

--- Comment #65 from Alexander Klepikov <klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot co=
m> ---
> I'm thinking of something else.

During kernel compile I got few internal errors in different passes. That i=
s,
additional loop optimization pass patch is no good at all.=