From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 2A0813858D20; Sat, 14 Oct 2023 15:20:25 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2A0813858D20
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1697296825;
	bh=t+pBhAxj+YoWvn8DGlQeRitXGzChf8gmSt8JgcqM2eg=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=b3wAJ8bf01Hwy2e762ZV1p2KeoKuWs1bAGrepaHUMlOCKCpvSDKZrpdx9k+DuXlgF
	 rAcFpV6f9bWRi2jCIi315d3jqUK9WoxH8LMLUprcz365f7uscKaW1Dkb7DTlu/GtiR
	 l2wxtJyeRC4IuduG0atTNfid9wpx7FTlEWvDRTFg=
From: "klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/54089] [SH] Refactor shift patterns
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2023 15:20:22 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-54089-4-T82nHRelW5@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-54089-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-54089-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D54089

--- Comment #104 from Alexander Klepikov <klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot c=
om> ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #103)
> Sorry, I've been busy with other things.  I think your patch is OK, but I
> wanted to test it in more detail before committing it.

Oh, it's OK. By the way, your contribution is not less than mine.

I've been thinking about something. I suspect that this patch could take wo=
rk
away from other patches. I'm sorry, I don't know how to express myself
properly. I mean there's several patches that corrects shift patterns and '=
tst'
instruction generation (most of them are written by you, by the way). I sus=
pect
that some of them might not run anymore because this patch looks more gener=
al
and should cover more cases, including yet unknown cases, I hope. And, in t=
he
end, dead code may appear because of it. I hope I was able to make my point
clearly.=