From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 821823858D35; Wed, 21 Jun 2023 20:13:50 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 821823858D35
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1687378430;
	bh=jJAJ5gPSeVtCnxbIcE+GUxRHXjmrBdMMSAukARyHLkw=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=YPsl7CeCSzilzjtOsyQxSx1aFYaGS8Gpw/YJ2bVOEwAkPFTu6i+erjYdT+DeHmNAX
	 7eQbRBX/7duvOzsSJpP9+szmaW9rFlg/0uRuCwQanujqvnSCKuTEGx4Wrwl8glQ7fI
	 AltM0xnih6Trvw+9JTOlDJQttS4lPmyH+6/usQ4U=
From: "segher at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/54089] [SH] Refactor shift patterns
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2023 20:13:49 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: segher at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-54089-4-hDdN4BhJCW@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-54089-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-54089-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D54089

--- Comment #87 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #53)
> (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #52)
> > There is TARGET_LEGITIMATE_COMBINED_INSN though, which is a workaround =
for if
> > you really do not want the instruction combiner to create particular
> > instruction patterns (but it does nothing to prevent other parts of the
> > compiler from doing the same!)
>=20
> Thanks for pointing it out.  I knew I missed something recent ;)

g:78e4f1ad4e48, from 2012?  Well, fairly recent, okay :-)=