public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "janus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/54107] [4.8 Regression] Memory hog with abstract interface
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 16:51:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-54107-4-27wb6jKRS5@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-54107-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54107
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-29 16:50:37 UTC ---
Reduced test case:
subroutine compute_routine (zfunc)
procedure(compute_routine) :: zfunc
end subroutine
I would assume that this is invalid, since the declaration of compute_routine's
interface is somehow 'recursive', i.e. referring to itself.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-29 16:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-27 12:00 [Bug fortran/54107] New: [4.8 Regression] dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2012-07-27 12:05 ` [Bug fortran/54107] [4.8 Regression] Memory hog with abstract interface dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2012-07-27 13:55 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-07-29 8:00 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2012-07-29 8:47 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-07-29 16:51 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2012-07-29 20:55 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-09-19 14:00 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-09-22 22:21 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2012-09-22 22:30 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-13 19:43 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-19 22:54 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-20 17:31 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-25 14:37 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-25 14:44 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-25 20:58 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-26 11:31 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-26 16:11 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-26 16:16 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-26 22:47 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-26 23:08 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-27 9:24 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-27 9:46 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-27 12:58 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-27 13:24 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-27 22:55 ` [Bug fortran/54107] [4.8 Regression] [F03] " janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-28 12:31 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-28 13:49 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-28 16:04 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-28 19:46 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-28 22:43 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-29 21:41 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-29 21:46 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-30 13:34 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2013-01-30 15:03 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-02-04 18:35 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-02-05 20:25 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2013-02-05 21:31 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-02-08 15:14 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-02-08 15:43 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-02-08 15:47 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2014-04-16 8:37 ` bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-54107-4-27wb6jKRS5@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).