From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1136 invoked by alias); 30 Jan 2013 15:03:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 1039 invoked by uid 48); 30 Jan 2013 15:02:48 -0000 From: "janus at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/54107] [4.8 Regression] [F03] Memory hog with abstract interface Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 15:03:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: janus at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: janus at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.0 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg02757.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54107 --- Comment #31 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-30 15:02:46 UTC --- (In reply to comment #30) > > ToDo: The test case in comment 4 still fails (cf. also comment 23 - 27). > > Note that after revision 195562, the test in comment #4 and its subsequent > modifications are no longer "memory hogs" and now give the ICE in a fraction of > second. Right. > Question: does the patch in comment #23 apply on top of r195562? Yes, it should.