From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5338 invoked by alias); 13 Feb 2013 17:06:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 5203 invoked by uid 48); 13 Feb 2013 17:06:16 -0000 From: "mrs at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug pch/54117] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: ./decl-3.h -O0 -g (internal compiler error) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 17:06:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: pch X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: mrs at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: steven at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.0 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2013-02/txt/msg01335.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54117 mrs@gcc.gnu.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #19 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-13 17:06:11 UTC --- I think in the release after next we can just deprecate stabs and all other non-dwarf debug formats (not remove them) and simply not worry about it. In the release after that, we then remove them. If someone doesn't like that, let them step forward as a stabs maintainer and fix it before release. This gives them 2 years to fix it or so. If they don't, then removal seems reasonable.