From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1227 invoked by alias); 19 Dec 2012 12:58:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 1159 invoked by uid 55); 19 Dec 2012 12:58:33 -0000 From: "dave.anglin at bell dot net" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/54120] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/random_2.f90 execution Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 12:58:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: dave.anglin at bell dot net X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.0 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-12/txt/msg01864.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54120 --- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-12-19 12:58:32 UTC --- On 19-Dec-12, at 5:54 AM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Or is it libgfortran itself that when built with r189365 works and > when r189366 > doesn't? If so, can you find where are the code differences? I'll try and debug this regression as soon as I can but it might not be until the weekend. -- John David Anglin dave.anglin@bell.net