From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3390 invoked by alias); 6 Aug 2012 09:11:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 3380 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Aug 2012 09:11:05 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 09:10:52 +0000 From: "steven at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/54179] please split insn-emit.c ! Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 09:11:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Keywords: memory-hog X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: steven at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-08/txt/msg00313.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54179 --- Comment #29 from Steven Bosscher 2012-08-06 09:10:49 UTC --- (In reply to comment #27) > Actually, I'm more interested in seeing if insn-emit.c can be reduced in size > by avoiding duplicate functions (see e.g. gen_swapdi/gen_swapsi/gen_swapxf for > x86_64 for a simple case of identical functions). This doesn't seem to be a winning opportunity. It should be possible to split insn-emit.c into separate files for define_insns, splitters, expanders, and peephole handlers, but that, too, doesn't seem to be a win because the vast majority of patterns are insns.