From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29443 invoked by alias); 5 Aug 2012 19:52:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 29429 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Aug 2012 19:52:10 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 05 Aug 2012 19:51:57 +0000 From: "jason.vas.dias at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/54179] please split insn-emit.c ! Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2012 19:52:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Keywords: memory-hog X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: jason.vas.dias at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-08/txt/msg00276.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54179 --- Comment #23 from Jason Vas Dias 2012-08-05 19:51:56 UTC --- Yes, I was wondering how long it would take to close this bug as INVALID, which seems to be the standard response to uncomfortable bug reports these days. It turned out to be less time than gcc is taking to generate the assembler for insn-emit.c :-) !