From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29158 invoked by alias); 5 Aug 2012 21:05:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 29149 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Aug 2012 21:05:54 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 05 Aug 2012 21:05:42 +0000 From: "steven at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/54179] please split insn-emit.c ! Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2012 21:05:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Keywords: memory-hog X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: steven at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-08/txt/msg00280.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54179 --- Comment #27 from Steven Bosscher 2012-08-05 21:05:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #26) > And what has any of this to do with the simple question posed in the title > of this bug report : why can't insn-emit.c be split ? It could be split up. But I wouldn't count on anyone doing the work. Patches welcome, of course... Actually, I'm more interested in seeing if insn-emit.c can be reduced in size by avoiding duplicate functions (see e.g. gen_swapdi/gen_swapsi/gen_swapxf for x86_64 for a simple case of identical functions).