From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-398263-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 7257 invoked by alias); 9 Aug 2012 23:35:20 -0000
Received: (qmail 7050 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Aug 2012 23:35:19 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 23:35:07 +0000
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/54180] a bug using strcat function - it depends on variable declare order, but it should not.
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 23:35:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status Resolution
Message-ID: <bug-54180-4-CUucbNRgac@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-54180-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-54180-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-08/txt/msg00535.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54180

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID

--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-08-09 23:35:06 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> all those variables are defined, otherwise it would not compile. The main is,
> that it is normal(both cases) for the "C" language syntax and both declaration
> orders should work.

With the correct lengths?  Writing past the array bounds in both C and C++ is
not required a diagnostic, it just invokes undefined behavior.