From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10495 invoked by alias); 8 Aug 2012 19:55:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 10483 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Aug 2012 19:55:34 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Aug 2012 19:55:21 +0000 From: "mikael at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/54199] Superfluous diagnostic "is also the name of an intrinsic" for internal procedures Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 19:55:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: mikael at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-08/txt/msg00462.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54199 Mikael Morin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mikael at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from Mikael Morin 2012-08-08 19:55:21 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) > Compiling the following program with -Wall gives the message: > > function fraction(x) > 1 > Warning: 'fraction' declared at (1) is also the name of an intrinsic. It can > only be called via an explicit interface or if declared EXTERNAL. > > I believe this message should not be printed for internal procedures. Maybe the second part is confusing, but a warning makes sense IMO. > > (For module procedures, there is a different warning, which can stay: > "'fraction' declared at (1) may shadow the intrinsic of the same name. In > order to call the intrinsic, explicit INTRINSIC declarations may be required.") That one would be fine for internal procedures, don't you think?