public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug debug/54205] New: recursive .debug_macro inclusions
@ 2012-08-08 19:52 tromey at gcc dot gnu.org
  2012-08-10  6:30 ` [Bug debug/54205] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2012-08-10 14:47 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: tromey at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-08-08 19:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54205

             Bug #: 54205
           Summary: recursive .debug_macro inclusions
    Classification: Unclassified
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.8.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: debug
        AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: tromey@gcc.gnu.org


Created attachment 27963
  --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27963
readelf output

I built git master gcc today.
Then I ran the libstdc++ pretty-printer tests.
One of these tests (48362.cc) caused gdb to die, so I investigated.
It turns out that gcc is emitting recursive DW_MACRO_GNU_transparent_include
calls in .debug_macro.  I previously thought I fixed this problem in
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13568
-- but the fix was insufficient; and in any case I think gcc should not do
this.
I'm attaching the readelf dump of the section so you can see the issue.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2012-08-10 14:47 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-08-08 19:52 [Bug debug/54205] New: recursive .debug_macro inclusions tromey at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-08-10  6:30 ` [Bug debug/54205] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-08-10 14:47 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).