From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12838 invoked by alias); 5 Dec 2012 13:19:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 11913 invoked by uid 48); 5 Dec 2012 13:18:37 -0000 From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/54259] [4.7 Regression] Regression in move construction for std::pair Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 13:19:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.7.3 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status Resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-12/txt/msg00471.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54259 Paolo Carlini changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2012-12-05 13:18:34 UTC --- Let's close this, we are not going to backport access control for SFINAE in the branch and there are decent workarounds.