* [Bug other/54279] [4.8 Regression] first stage build with g++ fails with "." as the first component of $PATH
2012-08-16 5:41 [Bug other/54279] New: first stage build with g++ fails with "." as the first component of $PATH gary at intrepid dot com
@ 2012-08-16 5:47 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-08-16 11:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-08-16 5:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54279
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |build
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2012-08-16
Summary|first stage build with g++ |[4.8 Regression] first
|fails with "." as the first |stage build with g++ fails
|component of $PATH |with "." as the first
| |component of $PATH
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-08-16 05:46:52 UTC ---
This might be the reason why we create xgcc than gcc and then only do the
namechange at install time. We need to do the same thing for g++ now.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/54279] [4.8 Regression] first stage build with g++ fails with "." as the first component of $PATH
2012-08-16 5:41 [Bug other/54279] New: first stage build with g++ fails with "." as the first component of $PATH gary at intrepid dot com
2012-08-16 5:47 ` [Bug other/54279] [4.8 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-08-16 11:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-09-19 14:31 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-08-16 11:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54279
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/54279] [4.8 Regression] first stage build with g++ fails with "." as the first component of $PATH
2012-08-16 5:41 [Bug other/54279] New: first stage build with g++ fails with "." as the first component of $PATH gary at intrepid dot com
2012-08-16 5:47 ` [Bug other/54279] [4.8 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-08-16 11:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-09-19 14:31 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-15 0:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-09-19 14:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54279
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
Priority|P3 |P1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/54279] [4.8 Regression] first stage build with g++ fails with "." as the first component of $PATH
2012-08-16 5:41 [Bug other/54279] New: first stage build with g++ fails with "." as the first component of $PATH gary at intrepid dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2012-09-19 14:31 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-11-15 0:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-15 2:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-11-15 0:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54279
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-11-15 00:31:45 UTC ---
I am going to take a stab at fixing this.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/54279] [4.8 Regression] first stage build with g++ fails with "." as the first component of $PATH
2012-08-16 5:41 [Bug other/54279] New: first stage build with g++ fails with "." as the first component of $PATH gary at intrepid dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2012-11-15 0:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-11-15 2:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-15 3:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-11-15 2:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54279
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-11-15 02:51:15 UTC ---
Created attachment 28693
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28693
Patch which I am testing right now
Once my testing finishes (including installing), I will submit this.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/54279] [4.8 Regression] first stage build with g++ fails with "." as the first component of $PATH
2012-08-16 5:41 [Bug other/54279] New: first stage build with g++ fails with "." as the first component of $PATH gary at intrepid dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2012-11-15 2:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-11-15 3:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-15 4:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-11-15 3:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54279
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-11-15 03:40:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Created attachment 28693 [details]
> Patch which I am testing right now
>
> Once my testing finishes (including installing), I will submit this.
It had an issue while doing libstdc++ testing. So fixing up that testsuite.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/54279] [4.8 Regression] first stage build with g++ fails with "." as the first component of $PATH
2012-08-16 5:41 [Bug other/54279] New: first stage build with g++ fails with "." as the first component of $PATH gary at intrepid dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2012-11-15 3:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-11-15 4:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-15 20:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-11-15 4:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54279
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-11-15 04:31:44 UTC ---
libmudflap has the similar issue.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/54279] [4.8 Regression] first stage build with g++ fails with "." as the first component of $PATH
2012-08-16 5:41 [Bug other/54279] New: first stage build with g++ fails with "." as the first component of $PATH gary at intrepid dot com
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2012-11-15 4:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-11-15 20:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-28 22:11 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-11-15 20:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54279
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-11-15 20:29:12 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> libmudflap has the similar issue.
Actually the libmudflap is fixed by fixing libstdc++. Anyways I have a full
fix now. I am retesting it again.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/54279] [4.8 Regression] first stage build with g++ fails with "." as the first component of $PATH
2012-08-16 5:41 [Bug other/54279] New: first stage build with g++ fails with "." as the first component of $PATH gary at intrepid dot com
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2012-11-15 20:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-11-28 22:11 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-28 22:16 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-11-28 22:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54279
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-11-28 22:11:35 UTC ---
Author: pinskia
Date: Wed Nov 28 22:11:29 2012
New Revision: 193910
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193910
Log:
2012-11-28 Andrew Pinski <apinski@cavium.com>
PR bootstrap/54279
* configure.ac (CXX_FOR_TARGET): Change over to use xg++.
* configure: Regenerate.
* Makefile.tpl (POSTSTAGE1_CXX_EXPORT): Change over to use xg++.
* Makefile.in: Regenerate.
2012-11-28 Andrew Pinski <apinski@cavium.com>
PR bootstrap/54279
* Makefile.in (${QMTEST_DIR}/context): Use xg++ instead of g++.
2012-11-28 Andrew Pinski <apinski@cavium.com>
PR bootstrap/54279
* Make-lang.in (g++$(exeext)): Rename to
(xg++$(exeext)): This.
(g++-cross$(exeext)): Use xg++$(exeext) instead of g++$(exeext).
(c++.start.encap): Likewise.
(c++.install-common): Likewise.
2012-11-28 Andrew Pinski <apinski@cavium.com>
PR bootstrap/54279
* lib/g++.exp (g++_init): Search for xg++ instead of g++ in the build
directories.
* lib/obj-c++.exp (obj-c++_init): Likewise.
2012-11-28 Andrew Pinski <apinski@cavium.com>
PR bootstrap/54279
* scripts/testsuite_flags.in (--build-cxx): Use xg++ instead of g++.
* testsuite/lib/libstdc++.exp (libstdc++_init): Likewise.
Modified:
trunk/ChangeLog
trunk/Makefile.in
trunk/Makefile.tpl
trunk/configure
trunk/configure.ac
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/Makefile.in
trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/cp/Make-lang.in
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/lib/g++.exp
trunk/gcc/testsuite/lib/obj-c++.exp
trunk/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog
trunk/libstdc++-v3/scripts/testsuite_flags.in
trunk/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/lib/libstdc++.exp
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/54279] [4.8 Regression] first stage build with g++ fails with "." as the first component of $PATH
2012-08-16 5:41 [Bug other/54279] New: first stage build with g++ fails with "." as the first component of $PATH gary at intrepid dot com
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2012-11-28 22:11 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-11-28 22:16 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-02-10 12:28 ` karlson2k at gmail dot com
2022-01-08 4:08 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-11-28 22:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54279
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-11-28 22:15:48 UTC ---
Fixed. Thanks for your report.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/54279] [4.8 Regression] first stage build with g++ fails with "." as the first component of $PATH
2012-08-16 5:41 [Bug other/54279] New: first stage build with g++ fails with "." as the first component of $PATH gary at intrepid dot com
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2012-11-28 22:16 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-02-10 12:28 ` karlson2k at gmail dot com
2022-01-08 4:08 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: karlson2k at gmail dot com @ 2013-02-10 12:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54279
Evgeny Grin <karlson2k at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |karlson2k at gmail dot com
--- Comment #9 from Evgeny Grin <karlson2k at gmail dot com> 2013-02-10 12:28:13 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Fixed. Thanks for your report.
Nice!
Shouldn't we do the same for other tools/languages? Like ada, java?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/54279] [4.8 Regression] first stage build with g++ fails with "." as the first component of $PATH
2012-08-16 5:41 [Bug other/54279] New: first stage build with g++ fails with "." as the first component of $PATH gary at intrepid dot com
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2013-02-10 12:28 ` karlson2k at gmail dot com
@ 2022-01-08 4:08 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-01-08 4:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54279
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Karlson2k from comment #9)
> (In reply to comment #8)
> > Fixed. Thanks for your report.
>
> Nice!
> Shouldn't we do the same for other tools/languages? Like ada, java?
Java has seen been removed and was never affected. The problem only shows up
while building of the front-ends only. I have to double check but I think ada
is fine as they use xgcc as the driver while building the front-end and I think
D might be ok too (it was recently moved over to compiling D code).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread